Skip to main content

Bereavement Leave

Bereavement Leave

A recent social media discussion has got me thinking about the difficulty in returning to work following the loss of your child.  For some it be can an unbearable experience that literally pushes many over the edge.  I was one of the lucky ones, I for many years have enjoyed an excellent working relationship with both my bosses and my direct reports in the same employment.  Bereavement leave, especially time taken for the death of your child is, I guess, not something that enters your mindset through everyday life.  That said, it never entered my head that within reason, I would not get given whatever fully-paid time I required to ensure that I was in the best possible place before contemplating returning to work.  Some people and way more than I realised until participating in that  recent twitter discussion do not have the luxury of understanding bosses and colleagues that I had when I returned to work 2 and half weeks later following the passing of our daughter.

Of course, child bereavement can come in different guises ranging from early-miscarriage, neo-natal death to the passing of a near young-adult.  As taboo as the death of a child is to many what I think is undeniable is that the passing of a child that they had met before rather than a baby that passed away either in hospital or in the mothers womb is easier for others to comprehend, bosses and the workplace are no definitely no different.

The rules in the workplace surrounding the bereavement of your child are at best subjective.  We may want to believe that all employers, large and small, will be sympathetic to employees—indeed, many do provide discretionary compassionate leave—but the truth is that not all are. A recent survey run on behalf of Child Bereavement UK found that almost a third of those who had suffered the loss of a loved one in the past five years felt they had not been treated compassionately by their employer. A father of a baby born at 26 weeks, who died aged three days, was called during his two-week paternity leave by his employer and told that, because his son was dead, there was no child to look after, so he was being treated as absent without leave and asked when he would be returning to work. The man did not work for a small business that was perhaps a bit backward in its approach to human resources; he worked for a large multinational company with more than 20,000 employees in the UK. Surely, some form of statutory protection is therefore needed.

The Employment Rights Act 1996 merely allows employees to take a “reasonable” amount of unpaid time off to deal with an emergency involving a dependant. As Ministers have rightly recognised, holding down a job at the same time as dealing with grief can be incredibly difficult. Therefore, more must be done. It was announced recently in Parliament that the Government are intent on providing parents with the support they need.  This is a standardisation that simply must happen sooner rather than later.  An understanding must be achieved in the workplace to allow the bereaved parent a chance to fulfil their professional aspirations.  Their world has changed forever, work colleagues must be given the opportunity to both understand and provide help and guidance.

The recent discussion evoked thoughts that I simply had not considered.  In the aftermath of our daughter passing we received a lot of direct support from my employers.  Beautiful bouquets of flowers received, cards of support from colleagues, offers to pickup our other children from the playground.  I received regular calls from my bosses although I accept that they must have been incredibly hard for them to make.  To the credit of my work colleagues, I do not even remember walking through the door, or through the office to my desk on that first morning back although I do remember after sitting at my desk for a few minutes thinking to myself “for god sake someone say something to me!”  For others it must have been so horribly different and must have taken an amazing amount of strength to literally get out of bed.  I’m sure many quit their jobs through the lack of compassion of bosses and peers, that is incredibly unfair.  What if after returning to work, the quality of the employee’s work has suffered?  What measures should the employer be taking to ensure that the parent is given every opportunity to get back to the standard of their work prior to losing their child? Should a bereaved father have the same careful treatment as the mother?  What about babies lost in early parts of pregnancy, what level of understanding can one expect from those who have not suffered such a loss?  Should the bereavement be grounds for flexible working?  So many modern-day but key questions which I will explore over the coming weeks and months.

Of course, everyone is different I would be classed in the “workaholic” bracket because I am fortunate enough to work in a profession that I truly love and throwing myself into my project work is my way of dealing with things.  That’s how I coped with my marriage breakdown many years before.  So, work was my salvation, but it was not about me, it was about Amanda and the other children – the protective partner and father thing!

Thankfully, we are moving into a more modern time where we can expect to be represented by our MP, we can expect to be treated with compassion at work and can expect to receive a certain level of tolerance.  Let’s hope HR Managers lead the way and ensure that agreed, reviewed and approved processes are in place to safeguard a parent when they truly need them.


Popular posts from this blog

MP Sharon Hodgson - My stillborn baby did 'not exist'

Last week, in the House of Commons, MP Sharon Hodgson broke down as she revealed her agony of being told her stillborn daughter, Lucy, who was born 20 years ago at 23 weeks + 5 days did not ‘officially exist’.That is because under UK law, parents are not given a birth or death certificate if the child is not born alive before 24 weeks’ gestation.
Although the passing of her daughter was not as far as I’m aware related to a Group B Strep infection, listening to her plea hit home with us and got us thinking about what she is asking for.Her little girls heart had beat through most of her labour and she held her babies motionless body in her arms in hospital.
It surely cannot be questioned that indelible memory is fact that her daughter indeed existed. MP Sharon Hodgson, 02/02/18 Our daughter, Mia was born alive at 25+5 weeks (2 weeks older than Lucy) and lived for 22 minutes, therefore she ticked all the boxes to be classed as having ‘officially existed’ therefore her birth and death would…

4 Years tomorrow….

4 Years tomorrow….

It seems inconceivable that it’s four years tomorrow that Mia was born.It goes without saying that both her mum and I are different people, changed beyond recognition.Sometimes it feels like we are going nowhere, the world is not listening and then out of the blue something happens like a media interview request that happened earlier this week on how things had changed over the 4 years and in light of the new leaflet now being given out to pregnant families detailing the existence and effect of Group B Strep.

Tomorrow will be quiet, just myself, Amanda and Theo – I’m hoping we will see the other children too at some point in the day, because for tomorrow nothing else matters X